Publications associated with Langfeldt, Liv
In Need of a Better Framework for Success
An evaluation of the Norwegian participation in the EU 6th Framework Programme (2003–2006) and the first part of the EU 7th Framework Programme (2007-2008)
Rapport 22
Read more...
Tverrfaglighet i Norges forskningsråd
En analyse av kodepraksis og suksessrater for tverrfaglige søknader
Rapport 3
Read more...
Faglige og institusjonelle avgrensninger
Bakgrunnsdata til Norges forskningsråd for evaluering av fagene filosofi, rettsvitenskap sosiologi, sosialantropologi og samfunnsgeografi
Rapport 1
Read more...
The internationalisation of national knowledge policies
In Gornitzka, Å. & Langfeldt, L. (Eds.), Borderless Knowledge: Understanding the "new" Internationalisation of Research and Higher Education in Norway
Read more...
Crossing the borders
In Gornitzka, Å. & Langfeldt, L. (Eds.), Borderless Knowledge: Understanding the "new" Internationalisation of Research and Higher Education in Norway
Read more...
Borderless knowledge
Understanding the "new" Internationalisation of Research and Higher education in Norway
Higher Education Dynamics 22
Read more...
The 2nd evaluation of the European Young Investigator Award Scheme (EURYI)
Analysis of the first three calls for proposals
Rapport 3
Read more...
Review of the Human Frontier Science Program's Initiatives 2000-2005
NIFU STEP Working paper 26
Read more...
Economic Research in Norway: Institutions, resources, personnel and publishing
Report to the evaluation panel
NIFU STEP Working Paper 24
Read more...
Kriterie- og metodegrunnlag for (re)akkreditering av høyere utdanning
NIFU STEP Arbeidsnotat 1
Read more...
Constructing scientific quality.
Constraints and biases in grant review processes
In Hillevi Granetz (Ed.): Reaching for scientific excellence in gender research. Conference report 6, s. 24-31
Read more...
The policy challenges of peer review: Managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments.
I Research Evaluation 1, 31-41
Characteristics and challenges of peer review are elucidated from three different perspectives: a social dynamics perspective defining peer review as an important control mechanism in the research community; an uncertainty perspective focusing on the inherent uncertainty in judging research quality: and an organisational perspective focusing on the effects of different ways of organising peer review. Findings from a broad set of empirical studies are used. Peer review often has some conservative and risk-minimising aspects, which may disfavour interdisciplinary and non-conventional research. When the aim is to actively promote interdisciplinary or other kinds of non-conventional research, the involved peer-review system consequently needs to be adjusted to a more risk-taking mode.
Read more...Fagfellevurdering - et evalueringsverktøy som krever tilpasning
I Evaluering Nyt (mars -06) s. 15-20
Read more...
Norske deltakeres erfaringer med og utbytte av EUs 6. rammeprogram
Arbeidsnotat 31
Read more...
Marin FoU og havbruksforskning 2003
Ressursinnsats og vitenskapelig publisering
Skriftserie 3
Read more...
Evaluation of the European Young Investigator Awards Scheme
NIFU STEP Working paper 10
Read more...
The role of academics in the Bologna process - a survey of participation and views
Results from a survey among EI-member organisation in Europe. Working paper
NIFU STEP Working paper 1
Read more...
Profiling comprehensiveness? Strategy formulation and effects of strategic programmes at traditional universities
I: Gornitzka, Å., M. Kogan and A. Amaral (eds.): Reform and Change in Higher Education
Read more...
Expert panels evaluating research: discision-making and sources of bias
Research Evaluation 1, pp 51-62
This study consists of in-depth analysis of six international evaluations of Norwegian research. There was little overlapping competence on the panels, a high degree of task division and the composition of an expert panel, the organisation of its work and lack of group interaction, may have been decisive for the conclusions of the evaluations. Moreover, there seems to have been a serious disparity between the processes and resources of the studied evaluations and the demands that ideally should be met when judging scholarly quality. The revealed weaknesses are believed to be inherent to the concept of expert panel evaluation of research as an instrument for national research policy, and not specific for the studied evaluations.
Read more...Bibliometrisk analyse av faggrensene i Norges forskningsråds fagevalueringer
NIFU Skriftserie 14
Read more...
Profilerte breddeuniversiteter?
Formulering, organisering og iverksetting av strategiske satsinger ved norske universiteter
NIFU Rapport 3
Read more...
In search of 'Mode 2'
The nature of knowledge production in Norway
Minerva 237-250
This article investigates the contention that we are seeing the emergence of new forms of knowledge production, transforming the expectations and assessment of fundamental research. We examine three dimensions in the assessment of research. Our studies show little evidence of any significant change in practice in the three sectors in which research is undertaken in Norway.
Read more...Evaluering av NTNUs program for tverrfaglig forskning
NIFU Skriftserie 21
Read more...
Decision-making in expert panels evaluating research
Constraints, processes and bias
NIFU Rapport 6
Read more...
The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Rewiev, and Their Effects on the Rewiev Outcome
Social Studies of Science 6, 820-41
Read more...
Evaluering av forskningskvalitet
Et kritisk blikk på felfellevurdering
NIFU Skriftserie 9
Read more...
Fagfellevurdering som forskningspolitisk virkemiddel
En studie av fordelingen av frie midler i Norges forskningsråd
Rapport 12
Read more...
Last updated on 16/02/2010 by Webredaktør